The
Problem Homeowner's insurance is generally required to obtain
a loan and close escrow on a home purchase. Most loan documents
require homeowners to maintain homeowner's insurance for the term of
the loan. However, homeowner's insurance in Arizona, as in other
states, is less available and more expensive than in years past. The
Consumer Federation of America reports that homeowner's insurance
rates in Arizona rose 13.25 percent in 2001 and 14.82 percent in
2002. Some homes may be virtually uninsurable.
The Cause The insurance industry cites
some of the following reasons for the increased cost and reduced
availability of homeowner's insurance:
- Number of recent catastrophes
- Mold claims
- Stock market losses
- Repair cost increases
- Past use of these policies as a "loss leader" to
secure auto and other coverages
People and property most likely to be
affected Those most likely to be affected are:
- People who have made an insurance claim or claims
inquiry in the last five years.
- People with adverse credit issues.
- A home on which an insurance claim has been made,
especially if the claim involved mold and conditions conducive to
mold, such as water damage.
The Arizona Department of Insurance reports that in
2002, consumers reported difficulty in obtaining insurance for
"vacant dwellings, dwellings in unprotected areas, low-valued
dwellings, old dwellings, high priced dwellings and dwellings that
have had any losses within the last three years." (Press Release,
April 2, 2003)
Reports from the Comprehensive Loss Underwriting
Exchange ("CLUE") C.L.U.E. tracks both the person making an
insurance claim and the property on which the claim was made. This
repository of information purportedly contains 95 percent of all
insurance claims or claim inquiries made in the United States for a
five year period. The report includes information on the cause of
loss and the amount paid by the insurance company on the claim, if
any. The report also contains personal information on the homeowner,
such as the owner's social security number and date of
birth.
Obtaining a claims history report A
homeowner may be able to obtain a five-year claim history at no cost
by simply requesting the report from their insurance agent. In the
alternative homeowners may purchase a C.L.U.E. report on their own
property. Buyers may request a copy of the C.L.U.E. or claims
history report from the seller, but do not have the right to order a
report on a home they do not own.
The C.L.U.E. report is sold by a company called
ChoicePoint and currently costs $19.50. The report may be obtained
by calling 866/527-2600 or online at http://www.choicetrust.com/ .
Individuals may also obtain their personal insurance history from
the same company.
Insurance cancellations after close of
escrow Some insurance companies that use information from
C.L.U.E. or other insurance reporting agencies in their underwriting
practices obtain a report only after a binder (contract for
temporary insurance) is issued or after escrow has closed and the
policy is to be issued. Thus, there have been numerous reports of
homebuyers having their homeowner's insurance cancelled after
closing escrow on a home purchase.
An insurer can generally cancel a homeowner's
insurance policy for any reason in the first sixty days after
issuance. See A.R.S. § 20-1652. And once a policy is cancelled, the
cost of replacement coverage can be two to three times higher than
the original cost, depending on the reason for the
cancellation.
Simply obtaining the C.L.U.E. report or claims
history does not solve the problem The underwriting practices
of individual insurance companies vary and not all insurance
companies use C.L.U.E. reports on both the person and the property.
The companies that do use C.L.U.E. or other claims history reports
evaluate the information in different ways. Therefore, simply
obtaining a copy of the report will not tell a buyer how an
individual insurance company will evaluate the risk of insuring that
particular buyer in that particular home.
AAR's response to this concern The Arizona
Association of REALTORS® ("AAR") has been proactive in
responding to this homeowner's insurance crisis. AAR has undertaken
to educate buyers about this issue and encourage them to apply for
homeowner's insurance as soon as a purchase contract is executed.
The AAR Residential Resale Purchase Contract advises buyers to make
inquiries and consult insurance agents during the contract
inspection period. AAR's Seller's Property Disclosure Statement
("SPDS") prompts the seller to disclose any known homeowner's
insurance claims regarding the home. The Buyer Advisory
informs buyers about how claims history may affect their homeowner's
insurance.
AAR also initiated a legislative response to address
these problems. Senator Barbara Leff agreed to sponsor Senate Bills
1265 and 1266, both of which have been passed by the
legislature.
SB 1265 requires that if an insurer uses information
from an insurance support organization, such as C.L.U.E., or
information from a consumer reporting agency for underwriting
purposes, the insurer must obtain that information as soon as
practicable and before the issuance of a binder of insurance
coverage. The failure of the insurer to timely obtain the
information precludes the insurer from declining insurance coverage
or terminating a binder of insurance coverage based on the
information. Finally, thirty days after the application for
insurance coverage, no declination or termination of insurance
coverage may be based on information from an insurance support
organization or consumer reporting agency.
SB 1265 should reduce the possibility that the
homebuyer's insurance policy will be cancelled after close of
escrow. However, an insurer still may decline or terminate insurance
coverage based on the condition of the premises as determined
through a physical inspection of the premises.
SB 1266 addresses premium increases when the
insurance company has suffered no loss. Homeowners have complained
that their premiums were increased based upon property damage or
loss when the insurer made no payments under the policy. AAR
believes that a claim that results in no payment by an insurance
company should not result in increased premiums to the homeowner.
However, in a compromise with the insurance industry, AAR accepted
the following language: "[a]n insurer shall not charge more for
homeowner's insurance coverage with a single below deductible claim,
not exceeding five hundred dollars in the previous three years, than
it would charge for like coverage on the same property if the
property had no below deductible claims." "Below deductible claim"
means a claim was closed without any payment because the amount of
the loss was less than the amount of the deductible provided by the
policy. This legislation will become effective 90 days after the end
of the current legislative session.
To obtain additional information on homeowner's
insurance The Arizona Department of Insurance has developed a
comparison of homeowner's insurance rates to encourage consumers to
comparison shop for their insurance, which may be found at www.id.state.az.us/index.html .
Advice to homebuyers AAR is considering
other possible actions to address these concerns and further
legislation may be necessary. In the meantime, buyers should educate
themselves about their insurance company's underwriting practices
and shop around for a company that will best suit the buyer's needs.
Further, a buyer may want to request that the seller provide the
buyer with a five year claims history of the home, so any claims
issues are identified early in the transaction. Finally, buyers
should apply for homeowner's insurance as soon as possible after
entering a contract to purchase a home.
K. Michelle Lind, Esq.
Michelle is general counsel to the Arizona
Association of REALTORS® (“AAR”) and a State Bar of Arizona board
certified real estate specialist. She serves as the primary legal
advisor to the association, provides legal direction in the
development of standard forms, is involved in legislative advocacy,
and assists in the association’s educational efforts.
Please note that this article is of a general
nature and may not be updated or revised for accuracy as statutory
or case law changes following the date of first publication.
Further, this article reflects only the opinion of the author, is
not intended as definitive legal advice and you should not act upon
it without seeking independent legal counsel.
|